Short, targeted checks on premises, people, records and courts across Latin America, so you decide on what was confirmed, not on what was filed. Each check states what it could and could not observe, and can run alone or inside a wider mandate such as investigative due diligence or corporate fraud investigations.
Investors and corporates
See it before capital moves.
A dated visit shows what the filing cannot.
Banks and insurers
Get a dated, observed account.
Law firms and funders
Hand counsel verified facts.
Intelligence firms
Local checks under your direction.
| Comparison | Digital screening | Field verification |
|---|---|---|
| What it shows | What was filed or published | What can be observed on a given date |
| Typical gap | Cannot say whether the address is occupied or active | Shows only what is visible at that time |
| Best use | First pass on many counterparties | One fact that decides the matter |
The two work together. Screening tells you where to look; a dated visit tells you what is actually there.
Each check answers a defined question and states what it could and could not observe.
“The address on the contract looks fine on paper. Nobody has actually been there.”
We attend on a stated date and document what is observable at the address: activity, signage, occupants and access.
You see what the address actually does.
“Is there already a case against them? We cannot tell from here.”
We search the agreed courts and periods and describe what each search covered, so you know where the gaps are.
You know what the courts hold, and what they were not asked.
“We are about to put this person in charge. Who are they, really?”
We examine an individual's relevant public record and professional history, for a lawful purpose defined before work starts.
You decide on a person with the record in front of you.
“We need the official document, not someone's summary of it.”
We obtain the available official records and tell you plainly what access, fees or delays stood in the way.
You hold the original, with its source shown.
“Everyone says these parties are unconnected. Nobody has drawn the lines.”
We connect people, entities and assets through cited evidence, and mark every inference as an inference.
You see the connections, and which ones are proven.
“One fact decides this. We need someone to confirm it on the ground.”
We answer one defined question with a short, targeted enquiry that can stand alone or sit inside a larger mandate.
You get the answer that moves the assessment.
These checks run alone or inside a wider mandate such as investigative due diligence or corporate fraud investigation. See all investigative services.
Each report states the date of the visit, the address checked and what could be observed: activity, signage, occupants and access. It compares those observations with the documents provided, marks inferences as inferences, and says plainly what one visit cannot show. You receive what was confirmed, what was not, and why.
Access to premises, records and courts differs by country. We agree the checks for each jurisdiction, confirm what is open before work starts, and plan every visit to be lawful and discreet. Checks run alone or inside a wider mandate such as investigative due diligence or corporate fraud investigation.
A short conversation can show which single check would change your assessment.
Talk to usThree steps, kept short because the question is narrow.
We pin down the single fact that matters to your decision and the lawful way to test it.
The visit, search or retrieval is carried out and recorded, with dates and sources.
You receive what was confirmed, what was not, and why, in a form you can act on.
It is a dated, in-person check that compares the documents with what can be observed: whether premises are occupied and active, and whether people and activity match the filing. A document says what was filed; a visit shows what is happening on a given date. That can confirm a claim or expose a gap before you rely on it, which is often the fact that changes the assessment.
Discretion is planned into every visit, and it is always lawful. Visits are timed and scoped to draw little attention, and the observer records only what can be seen from where they may lawfully stand. You receive a dated account of what was there, with its limits stated.
Yes. Each check can be commissioned alone or placed inside a larger mandate, whichever fits the question. A single targeted enquiry is often enough when one fact decides the matter, and the scope, timing and fee are agreed before any work begins.
They are agreed for each jurisdiction, because access differs by country, court and record. We propose the courts, registers and periods that bear on your question and confirm what is open before work starts. The jurisdiction notices set out the limits that apply.
Tell us the fact that matters and the decision it feeds. Conflicts and lawful purpose are checked first, then we propose a scope and fee.
With your permission we use Google Analytics to understand how this site is used. If you reject, no analytics script is loaded. You can change your choice at any time through Cookie Preferences in the footer. Google Analytics loads only if you accept; if you reject, nothing is loaded. Change your choice any time via Cookie Preferences in the footer. See the Privacy Notice.